It would be nice to control all of my file synchronizations from a single interface. I don't want to accidentally miss some gap between the two different systems and lose some files because of it. I don't want versioning stored differently for different tools. I want certainly directories synced seamlessly both locally and remotely. Every different tool has its own syntax, structure, and quirks. I would like to use syncthing for this for two major reasons:
Syncthing compression windows#
I have the exact same use-case as On a Windows machine, I have an SSD that I want to sync to an internal HDD RAID 1 array for backups. I am sure to at least send in my tiny donation because I want to support this initiative. Don't want to implement RAID on the SSD.Ī respectful thanks to all the developers. I want a one-way 'mirroring' from my SSD to an inexpensive HDD on the same PC, to cover against SSD failure. It's a random idea and I know it's easier said than done what happens if the pool never reaches the threshold or if it goes over, who manages the funds, when the developers get paid, bug fixes, etc.
Of course, more intricacies would need to be worked out, e.g.
When the target is met, the developers would implement it. If a feature is desirable by so many people, how about setup a contribution pool specifically for it, which has a target amount depending on the difficulty of the task.
Syncthing compression code#
Changing even a couple of innocuous lines of code can sometimes be catastrophic, and that is why testing takes so much longer.įor those who claim a feature is easy to implement, why don't you jump in and do it so everyone benefits?Īnother idea that may need some way to implement: Quite contrarily, there are several posts that are rude sounding.
Syncthing compression free#
And the public who gets this product free of cost (like me) should give their feature requests with a hint of gratitude and not as demands. If my understanding is correct, the developers are writing this code for no compensation other than the trickle the donations may provide. As I am pretty sure there are hundreds (if not thousands) of users looking for something like this. So hopefully this is enough reason for you to reconsider your approach, and allow for local sync on same machine. Most importantly I want this process to be automated and accurate. I work on source code of my project, like SCSS, JS (es6/es7 etc) and compile it to css/js using tools such as grunt, webpack or similar, and sometimes I test same code on multiple websites (on my local server), so I don't want to manually copy the files on two separate folders on my local machine.
In my opinion this app by design should not assume that I only want to sync between two devices, its primary purpose is syncing the files / directories, which it should focus on.Īnd as an addon, there should be features allowing users to sync between devices, between local and remote servers (http, ftp, dropbox, amazon s3, whatever), or in this case on same device. I am not sure about other users reasons to sync local directories.īut I have been doing it with various tools over the years, and been looking for something like rsync for it (specially on windows :() and stumbled upon your tool.Īnd was hopeful that it might solve my problem.
0 kommentar(er)
